Platform Tennis News

Click on the
paddle to see
this month's
articles

Home
About this Site
Archives
Links

Contact

 

“WOULDN’T IT BE NICE IF THE PADDLE COMMUNITY
FOLLOWED THIS LEAD?”

By Charles E. Vasoll


Duane Hayden, President of the Long Island Platform Tennis Association sent me the following article from a July 1989 issue of Golf Journal, the United States Golf Association’ s member publication.

 

“Another Open entry record was set as 5,786 were accepted, 11 more than last year’s record of 5,775. At that, 5,902 submitted entries, but 116 were rejected for various reasons, most commonly ineligibility (37), those whose past performances didn’t match up with their claimed handicaps. Thirty-three applicants were rejected because they had handicaps above the Open limit of 2. Another 26 withdrew, 16 lacked verified handicaps and four were duplicates – cases in which applicants, possibly stricken with nervous amnesia, entered twice.

Although entry forms are available months in advance, it is typical each year for the bulk of them to show up in the final days. Indeed, this year one prospect drove up (to Far Hills, New Jersey) from Washington, D.C, on the final day with his entry, and a woman, acting for the club professional for whom she works, drove down from Connecticut and managed to beat the deadline. She said she never spent a day quite like it. Golf House is not easy to find.

Still another of the huge last-minute crowd flew his entry into Newark, where a courier waited to pick up the form and his check, and rushed it to Golf House, 30 miles away, where it arrived at 4:50 p.m., 10 minutes before the deadline. Despite all the advance publicity about requirements and the firm deadline, 176 entries trickled in after the witching hour.

Some things never change.”

 

Mr. Hayden asked, “Wouldn’t it be nice if the paddle community followed this lead?”

He was specifically referring, I believe, to the key words “final deadline”. Whether it is a club tournament, a local competition, an APTA ranking event or a National Championship, Tournament Directors have been “soft” on making final deadlines meaningful. Not only do they not stop accepting entries, but also, with a goal of obtaining as many entries as possible, they often “recruit” more participants after the deadline. It’s no wonder that everyone waits until the last minute to enter an event even, in some cases, the defending champions.

The solution, of course, is easy. Follow the lead of the USGA and make the final deadline really final! The APTA has to take the lead in this action and demand that Tournament Directors enforce the final date for entry in its sanctioned competitions.

Click HERE to Return to Archives

© 2003-2008 Platform Tennis News.